PEER INTERACTION AS A DETERMINANT OF EFL ENGAGEMENT: EVIDENCE FROM STUDENTS AT A KURDISH UNIVERSITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26436/hjuoz.2026.14.4.1822Keywords:
Peer Interaction, Kurdish University EFL Learners, Social Factors, Higher EducationAbstract
Although the topic of engagement has been explored in many research studies, few studies have focused on the importance of social factors such as peer interaction on behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement of Kurdish learners of English as a Foreign Language (EFL). The research aims to explore the effect of peer interaction and feedback on learner behavioral, emotional and cognitive involvement, and to determine whether the level of English language proficiency (ELP) influences the relationship between the role of peers and learner engagement. This study explores the role of peer interaction and feedback in the engagement of the learners with respect to the Kurdish higher education system in particular at the university of Duhok. A mixed method design was used, which included focus group discussions, open-ended responses in the survey as well as a standardized English language assessment. The subjects of the study were 134 second- and third-year Kurdish EFL learners and they were divided into three levels: beginner, intermediate and advanced levels based on the Oxford Placement Test. The results suggest that positive peer engagement and feedback are important factors in improving behavioral, emotional and cognitive involvement. The results of statistical analysis revealed that 66.5% of the students expressed positive engagement and that the peer interaction had the highest score for engagement (M = 1.78) and was the only statistically significant predictor of positive engagement (p < .05) when compared with other variables. The results indicated that a weak positive correlation was found between engagement and academic achievement (r = .12). These findings also indicate that the effect of peer support depends on levels of proficiency and that the nature of the peer support (e.g. group size, workload distribution, classroom structure, etc.) affects the impact. Inevitably, smaller groups were related to higher levels of involvement and interaction. Engagement was not always associated with improved learning outcomes. The research emphasizes the need for establishing a supportive peer learning atmosphere which enables meaningful involvement in Kurdish EFL classrooms. This work makes further contributions to the distinctions between learner engagement and motivation, participation, and academic achievement. The methodological transparency and analytical rigor were enhanced through strengthening of reliability procedures, coding procedures, and statistical interpretations.
Downloads
References
Ahmed Abdel-Al Ibrahim, K., Cuba Carbajal, N., Zuta, M. E. C., & Bayat, S. (2023). Collaborative learning, scaffolding-based instruction, and self-assessment: Impacts on intermediate EFL learners’ reading comprehension, motivation, and anxiety. Language Testing in Asia, 13(1), 16.
Alzubi, A. A., Nazim, M., & Ahamad, J. (2023). Examining the effect of a collaborative learning intervention on EFL students’ English learning and social interaction. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(2), 26–46.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chun, J., & Cennamo, K. (2022). A theoretical model of peer learning incorporating scaffolding strategies. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 33(3), 385–397.
Dörnyei, Z. (2019). From integrative motivation to directed motivational currents: The evolution of the understanding of L2 motivation over three decades. In M. Lamb, K. Csizér, A. Henry, & S. Ryan (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of motivation for language learning (pp. 39–69). Palgrave Macmillan.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation (2nd ed.). Pearson.
Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1(1), 3–18.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
Karim, H. A., & Mohammed, A. A. (2018). Implementing peer teaching to enhance English students’ language learning: Kurdish EFL teachers’ and students’ perspectives. Journal of Garmian University, 5(1), 1–24.
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.
Omar, F. R., Mahmood, M. A., & Mustafa, A. A. (2023). Friends’ impact on learners’ motivation to learn the English language: Kurdish EFL learners’ attitudes. Koya University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), 160–169.Oxford University Press. (n.d.). Oxford placement test. https://elt.oup.com/feature/global/oxford-online-placement/test-format
Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3–19). Springer.
Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dejeen Mohammed Ali Taha, Shivan Shlaymoon Toma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY-NC-SA 4.0] that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work, with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online.
